Religious Tolerance at its Finest

So this poor guy was forcibly impeded from his basic human freedom of choice.

We can only learn so much from an article, but it doesn't appear that he was proselytizing, or challenging the old ways. He simply wanted to explore his own roots like any curious adult might. He built something with his own time and money for his own personal use and the bigots banded together to tear it down.

Why? Because they believed it was satanic.

Nevermind that "Satanic" has no real meaning. It's not like it had horns and was called the "Satan Invitation Location". These ignorant morons think that it's evil because some missionaries told them it was evil. The missionaries think it's evil because someone told them.

"I fucking love sweat lodges!"

In spite of the fact that there is no such thing as witchcraft or magic these people formed a mob and destroyed and restricted the efforts of another human being for fear of them. All in the name of Christianity.

Faith is of no value to knowledge and is extremely pertinent to ignorance. Why do we tolerate such an intolerant, illogical basis for decision making? Why is faith-based reasoning not laughed out of courts and strictly punished when it crosses these lines? Why must we continue to walk on eggshells around people who are too stupid to challenge their own idiotic beliefs?

Why does reason not rule and are we getting closer or further from it?

I feel it's best to resist the vocal ignorance when we come across it, we ought not accommodate their stupidity. We should stand firm and make ourselves immovable objects that they must be forced to contend with. You can keep your stupidity corralled up in your own house, but do not even think it will be accepted in mine. Truth must be held over superstition. Feelings are not as important as reality and people must come to terms with it eventually whether they like it or not. I would even go so far as to say that crimes committed in the name of religion ought to be deemed hate crimes and punished as such. If the group of vandals were white while the owner of the sweat lodge was black, this would be a different matter. If he were making a gay demonstration and they responded equally, it would be a big deal as well. So why must religious differences be treated so lightly in the eyes of the public. This should just as unacceptable as any other form of intolerance.

Yes, we should be intolerant of intolerance.